BBC royal wedding coverage protected from budget cuts


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “BBC royal wedding coverage protected from budget cuts” was written by Tara Conlan, for guardian.co.uk on Friday 26th November 2010 13.05 UTC

BBC coverage of Prince William’s marriage to Kate Middleton will not fall victim to funding cuts required by the freezing of the annual licence fee at £145.50, according to a senior corporation executive.

Jana Bennett, BBC Vision director, warned of “potential delays” to planned series or events because of budget cuts, but said the royal wedding on 29 April will be given “due prominence … this will be a big-scale event”.

She said that BBC1 will carry the main responsibility of bringing “everybody together” for the Westminster Abbey ceremony and accompanying celebrations.

But she added that other BBC channels could also play a part, looking at details such as the wedding dress. “I could see BBC3 doing something like that though they’ve already got Don’t Tell the Bride,” she said.

A meeting of broadcasters about covering the event will take place next week and Bennett predicted the wedding could boost the sales of high-definition TV sets in the same way the Queen’s coronations enticed people to buy their first television in 1953.

Bennett admitted BBC TV series and events planned for 2012 onwards could be delayed as a result of the licence fee freeze.

She said the corporation will protect the “scale” of its London 2012 Olympics coverage but other major TV events are likely to suffer.

The BBC is facing a 16% funding cut in real terms over six years from next April, as the licence fee is frozen at the annual current level of £145.50, following the hastily negotiated and controversial deal with the government. The licence fee brings in £3.6bn a year for the BBC.

The new settlement was announced by the chancellor, George Osborne, on 20 October as part of the government’s comprehensive spending review. The BBC Trust announced in September that it would sacrifice an agreed 2% licence fee rise and freeze it at £145.50 for the financial year from 1 April.

Budgets for BBC TV channels for the year from 1 April will be set by around next February and will take into account the reduction in funding, Bennett said. She added that the BBC is looking at its finances across the board due to the impending funding cuts.

Speaking at a Broadcasting Press Guild lunch in London yesterday, Bennett said the freeze amounted to a loss of around £144m, and comes on top of the deficit created by the projected £1.5bn pension black hole.

She added that the BBC is aiming for a “zero balance sheet” by the end off its charter period in 2017, and executives are looking to see how this could be achieved.

More money could come from BBC Worldwide as it has had a good year and is looking to sell off a stake in its magazines business. “There’s a question of how much they are going to contribute,” Bennett said.

But she was coy on speculation that she might be joining BBC Worldwide, saying “people talk to me from time to time about jobs. There’s absolutely nothing I can tell you now.”

She also denied she has come under political pressure over Panorama’s forthcoming investigation into bids for the World Cup in 2018.

Bennett said The One Show is “in very good health” in spite of presenter Jason Manford’s high-profile and sudden resignation, but no replacement is imminent. “People will be interested [in applying] because it’s a great show,” she added.

She said that despite Manford departing under a cloud after tweeting explicit messages: “Tweeting isn’t banned. The problem is it feels private but it’s public.”

• To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000.

• If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

UK monarch in historic UAE visit

Royal wedding set to be a ‘semi-state occasion’


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Royal wedding set to be a ‘semi-state occasion’ at Westminster Abbey” was written by Stephen Bates, for The Guardian on Wednesday 24th November 2010 06.00 UTC

In one of the least unexpected announcements so far about next year’s royal wedding, it was revealed yesterday that Prince William will marry his fiancee Kate Middleton on Friday 29 April at Westminster Abbey.

Disclosing the news to journalists, Jamie Lowther-Pinkerton, the prince’s private secretary, took trouble to emphasise that, like most parents and in-laws, the royal family and the bride’s parents, Michael and Carole Middleton, wealthy in their own right, will meet the bulk of the costs, including those of the service, flowers, bride’s dress, catering and reception, and honeymoon.

Lowther-Pinkerton, normally a stern-faced former SAS officer, said with aplomb: “The couple are completely over the moon. I have never seen two happier people. They are on cloud nine.”

The two were said to be getting fully stuck into the arrangements, and imposing their views on staff in emails and calls from the couple’s cottage at RAF Valley on Anglesey, where William is working as a helicopter air sea rescue pilot.

The taxpayer will be expected to meet the cost of security and any service personnel on duty for the ceremonial, although officials said that any troops mustered would be drawn from those, such as the Household Cavalry, already assigned to ceremonial duties in London and would not be withdrawn from active service.

What were described as “associated and consequential costs”, such as those for ceremonials, have still to be talked through with the government. Lowther-Pinkerton said: “All parties involved in the wedding, not least Prince William and Miss Middleton, want to ensure that a balance is struck between enjoying the day and the current economic situation … The couple are mindful of the situation, and Prince William has already expressed a clear wish that any involvement by the armed forces should rely in great part on those servicemen and women already committed to public and ceremonial duties.”

The wedding will be what was termed a “semi-state” occasion. It is not yet known which if any members of foreign royal families may be invited.

Lowther-Pinkerton added: “We know the world will be watching on 29 April, and they are very keen it should be a classic British occasion … a classic example of what Britain does best. Prince William and Catherine made it very clear they wish everybody to be able to enjoy it with them, consequently it will be a proper celebration for the nation and the realm.”

That means probably open carriages and a uniformed cavalry escort. It is likely, though not yet fixed, the service will be conducted by Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury. The date is the feast day of St Catherine of Sienna, though this was said to be incidental. Westminster Abbey was chosen for its long associations with the royal family, “a feeling almost of a parish church”, said the private secretary.

News of the date would have come as a surprise, welcome or otherwise, to many couples who had already decided on the same day. Claire Webber, 30 and Jaimi Mitchell, 37, had set Friday 29 April 2011 as their special day soon after becoming engaged in March.

Yesterday they were astonished the royal couple had chosen the very same day. “I was really surprised,” said Webber, 30. “It’s still sinking in. It’s strange, but I think it’s really nice and it’s going to be very memorable.

“You can only look at it in a positive way. It’s a date everyone is going to remember, and people will be thinking about weddings anyway. And because it’s now going to be a bank holiday, our guests won’t have to take the day off.”

Mitchell and Webber have chosen Parklands Quendon Hall, a 17th century mansion set in a deer park in Essex, for their ceremony and reception, and are inviting 85 guests. The two have already paid for most of the wedding, including the bride-to-be’s dress and dresses for three bridesmaids and two flower girls, “mainly because of the VAT [rise in January]“, Webber said.

The couple work in insurance, met at their loss adjuster in the City five years ago, and got together a year later; he proposed on a boat trip in New Zealand.

She said she would, like many others, be keen to watch the royal wedding and will have the television on while getting ready for her big day. “We’re not getting married until the early afternoon, so if they get married in the morning I’m sure everyone will watch. I know I will.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Prince Charles speech about Campaign for Wool

Tags: ,

The Queen’s General Synod speech

Religious do not have monopoly on virtue, Queen says


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Religious do not have monopoly on virtue, Queen tells synod” was written by Riazat Butt, for guardian.co.uk on Tuesday 23rd November 2010 16.30 UTC

People of faith do not have a monopoly on virtue as British society was now “more diverse and secular”, the Queen told the Church of England today in an address to its governing body.

Speaking at Church House, central London, she told members of General Synod that believers and atheists were equally able to contribute to the prosperity and wellbeing of the country.

The Queen, who is supreme governor of the Church of England, said: “In our more diverse and secular society, the place of religion has come to be a matter of lively discussion. It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue and that the wellbeing and prosperity of the nation depend on the contribution of individuals and groups of all faiths and none.”

But, recalling the words of Pope Benedict XVI from his UK visit last September, she said churches “and the other great faith traditions” retained the potential to inspire “great enthusiasm, loyalty and a concern for the common good”.

Around 480 clergy, laity and bishops are gathered in central London to debate and vote on issues and policies affecting the life of the church.

At times the meetings stray from the Church of England stereotype of sandal-wearing niceties, descending into acrimony and outright hostility, especially over contentious issues such as women bishops.

Around 50 traditionalist clergy and five bishops have announced their intention to convert to Roman Catholicism, following a Vatican initiative, because they are unhappy with the level of protection from female ministry offered in the draft legislation that permits the ordination of female bishops.

The Queen referred to this tension in her address, saying synod had “many issues to resolve” in order to remain “equipped for the effective pursuit of its mission and ministry”, but that this difficulty might in fact revitalise the church.

“Some will no doubt involve difficult, even painful, choices. But Christian history suggests that times of growth and spiritual vigour have often coincided with periods of challenge and testing.”

She made no mention of the royal wedding, which will be held at Westminster Abbey, the location of that morning’s eucharist, but the subject was very much at the forefront of everyone’s mind, not least because of the suspension of a Church of England bishop and synod member who made disparaging remarks about Prince William and Kate Middleton’s engagement on his Facebook page.

Pete Broadbent, a suffragan in Willesden, said there ought to be a party in Calais “for all good republicans” to avoid the “nauseating tosh” surrounding the royal wedding. After criticising royalty for a history of broken marriages and a “corrupt and sexist” hereditary principle, he then went on to attack the “gutter press” for “persecuting” the royal family.

Yesterday Broadbent apologised for his remarks, calling them “deeply offensive”. But it was too late and his diocesan superior, the bishop of London, asked him to withdraw from public ministry until further notice.

The public outcry – from clergy and politicians alike – over the Facebook posts may have prompted the archbishop of Canterbury to tell the Queen, to prolonged applause, that he spoke “on behalf of everyone here” in “expressing our delight” at the “family news announced last week”.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Engagement of Prince William to Kate Middleton

Royals on Remembrance Day at the Cenotaph 2010

Charles, Camilla attend The Prince’s Trust Rock Gala

Duchess invites children to Clarence House

Tags: ,