Kate Middleton: William’s very private princess-to-be

Note: This article is from the Guardian.


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Kate Middleton: William’s very private princess-to-be” was written by Patrick Barkham, for The Guardian on Tuesday 26th April 2011 14.20 UTC

Beautiful, intelligent and down-to-earth, the commoner turned down the proposal of marriage from the prince, “afraid never, never again to be free to think, speak and act as I feel I really ought to”. In the end, though, Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon was persuaded to marry the man she knew as Bertie and became the much-loved Queen consort to King George VI, expertly performing royal duties across eight decades.

If Kate Middleton is suffering similar jitters as the TV towers rise on the Mall, she may take heart from the example of the Queen Mother, supposedly the last “commoner” to marry a man who would be king. For all the hyperbole of the royal wedding tearing asunder Britain’s rigid class system – Middleton’s first 13 years were spent living in a semi-detached house! Her great-great-grandfather was a coalminer! Her uncle is a ne’er-do-well! – there is plenty that is unique about the bride and the recognisably modern relationship that her wedding will celebrate.

Defenders of our hereditary monarchy aver that one of its great strengths is that we know exactly where our kings and queens come from – we watched them grow up, unlike politicians who arrive with an act in place and skeletons shoved firmly in closets.

Kate, or Catherine, as she is known by her family and her pre-university friends, is different. In the final hectic days before her marriage to William in front of a billion or more observers, she is still almost completely unknown. Despite books, documentaries and column miles devoted to her, she has given just one short interview, with William, on the day of her engagement. What are her qualities? What sort of consort to the future king will she be? What public role will she play? And how will she cope with our scrutiny?

Look back into anyone’s life and you can identify wry coincidences and apparently prophetic events. Myths and legends already swirl around Kate that suggest this royal romance was meant to be, despite her isolation from the aristocracy. She was born at the Royal Berkshire hospital in Reading on 9 January 1982, the first child of Carole and Michael, who met while she was a flight attendant and he was a steward with British Airways. Kate went to the local village primary school until Carole’s thriving business, Party Pieces, enabled the Middletons to pay for Kate, her younger sister, Pippa, and brother, James, to enjoy an upper-class-style schooling at private establishments.

Tall for her age, Kate excelled at sport after joining St Andrew’s school in Pangbourne, Berkshire. She was in the crowd one day when Prince William, then nine, visited to play hockey. Kate also enjoyed drama and starred in a number of plays including one Victorian melodrama in which she fell in love with a handsome, wealthy gentleman called William, who proposed marriage. (The denouement is less auspicious: Kate’s character and her child are abandoned by the ungallant William.)

Another legend from Kate’s childhood was that she stuck a poster of the prince on her wall while boarding at Marlborough school as a teenager. Kate insists it was the Levi jeans guy but this legend endures because it buttresses another myth – that Kate’s supposedly ambitious social-climbing mother urged her to go to St Andrews University after her gap year just to snare the prince.

Accounts of Middleton as a young woman are uniformly pleasant. No one speaks ill of her, privately or publicly. Middleton is described as intelligent (she got a 2:1 in history of art at university) but not goody-goody, and beautiful without being full of herself.

The childhood incident that has attracted greatest scrutiny, however, is her abrupt switch from Downe House school to Marlborough, aged 14, which convincing reports ascribe to bullying. The only old school friend from Marlborough who has talked at length, Jessica Hay, said Middleton was bullied because she was perceived “as quite a soft and nice person”. The headteacher of Downe House at the time denied Middleton was badly bullied although conceded the “catty” atmosphere may have left her feeling “like a fish out of water”.

This bullying seemed significant when it was revealed that one of Kate and William’s wedding charities was Beatbullying. Middleton could find a compelling role in tackling bullying issues but Prince William’s staff at Clarence House downplay this. The couple chose 26 different wedding charities “to reflect interests close to both of their hearts” says an aide.

Perhaps more can be gleaned of Middleton’s personality and passions from the present day. Here, the absence of information is telling. The royalty historian Hugo Vickers is amazed by the lack of leaks about the wedding. “It’s just so calm and discreet. It’s like the Kremlin,” he says. When Sarah Ferguson was getting married to Prince Andrew her former boyfriends came out of the woodwork; Kate’s only confirmed ex is invited to the wedding and has said nothing.

The couple are surrounded by a professional press operation. But royal sources insist that the lack of stories about Middleton is down to Kate and William themselves. “The couple are genuinely incomparable. They are one of the most high-profile couples in the world and yet you don’t know what they do in their private life, how they spend their time, what they enjoy, who their friends are,” says an aide. “There’s a reason for that – they are surrounded by an incredibly loyal group of friends who have never once spoken yet.”

This “vow of silence” has always been William’s way of doing things, says the aide; his way of finding a normal life “inside the bubble”. While celebrity couples are surrounded by “friends” who plant stories in the press, William and Kate ensure their friends say nothing about them. It’s said William used to pass false stories to friends to test them. “They are very single-minded about their life together,” says the aide.

Privately William is characterised as being strong-willed and knowing his own mind. “And Catherine does as well. They are cut from the same cloth in that respect,” says the aide. “She’s a very strong woman. You’d have to be.”

There are ample reserves of sympathy for William and Harry after the death of their mother, Diana, and some people welcome the fact that William’s marriage, after seven years of cohabitation (inconceivable at the start of the Queen’s reign), is so different from his father’s nuptials with his first wife. Kate, too, is very different from Diana: almost 10 years older and the first future queen to have a degree.

“She’s older, she’s better educated and comes from an ordinary family,” observes Judy Wade, Hello!’s royalty correspondent. “Diana came from a broken home – Kate doesn’t.”

Diana, Fergie and even Sophie Wessex all visibly changed and grew into their royal roles. “Kate is already there. She’s got her act in place,” says Vickers.

Public duties are deceptively difficult and the history of royal pratfalls is long in the modern media age. In the runup to the wedding, Kate has performed public engagements near the home she and William share in Anglesey, and in Lancashire and St Andrews, and royal watchers are impressed with her poise and self-assurance. “When she first came out at the engagement she was a bit overwhelmed by it all,” says Chris Jackson, Getty’s royalty photographer. “Since then she’s obviously had some training … because there was definitely a change when she visited the Anglesey lifeboat station.”

“You’d expect her to be shy but no, very confident,” says the royalty photographer Mark Stewart. “When Kate got out of that car in Wales it was like she had been doing it all her life.”

A successful royal partner needs more than fickle press approval, however. There is also the Firm, and its staff. Camilla has apparently remarked, “we are so lucky to have her”, but is Middleton well-liked by more humble members of the royal household? “Massively so,” says one aide. “What you see in public is what you get in private – very warm, very kind, very thoughtful, sensitive, very down-to-earth, very intelligent.”

But then again, warns Wade, every newcomer to the palace is feted at first. “She needs to be streetwise – Coronation streetwise. A final word of warning – be very careful of fake sheikhs.”

Royal aides say you can infer plenty about Middleton’s personality from the royal wedding. It is said that Charles and Diana were only permitted to invite a handful of guests each among the 3,000 dignitaries at their wedding in 1981. Kate and William have personally invited more than 1,000. Middleton has chosen the music (she has a passion for classical music) and everything “from carriages to canapes” says the aide. “She has taken a lead on all the things that have a creative input and has stamped her mark on it.”

As well as being sporty Middleton is a keen photographer (“not just happy snaps, pretty decent stuff which could be displayed in a gallery” claims a royal source) and does watercolours. Her unspectacular career at Jigsaw and then at Party Pieces, where she was responsible for the website and catalogue, has at least demonstrated an interest in design, marketing and fashion.

Middleton dresses herself “without any advice or input from the palace”, according to the royal source, and her style has attracted attention around the world. Salons in New York have reported customers asking for “a Kate” cut and her preppy look is credited with inspiring a Sloane revival.

The scale of the global interest in the royal couple is bigger than ever before. There is predictably intense interest in the US (NBC alone is sending 250 journalists to cover the wedding) but also in unexpected places, such as China and eastern Europe. “The world is after them,” says the publisher John Blake, who has sold rights around the world to his publishing house’s two Middleton books. “Everybody is interested. Diana was unique and such a creature of her time. Kate is more of a girl next door but her soap opera is only just beginning.”

A soap opera … can Kate cope? “The nickname she was given, Waity Katy, sums up her strength,” claims the royalty historian Robert Lacey, who likens her, favourably, no”t to Diana or the Queen Mother but to Prince Philip; like the Duke of Edinburgh, Middleton understands hers must be a supporting role. “Willingness to take second place is a very important attribute of being a royal consort. That’s something you never felt Diana took on board.”

A modest, subordinate role might suit the monarchy but will it fulfil popular expectations? Won’t Middleton need to take on a more dynamic role to be a popular modern woman? “It’s important to understand them as a couple rather than two individuals,” says a spokesperson for Clarence House. “He’s a search and rescue pilot and he’ll be that until 2013, based in Anglesey. Their life will be in Anglesey.”

Middleton is expected to develop links with charities that fit with “her two big developing areas of interest”, the arts and sport, but at first they will only do royal engagements together. “Their intention is for the first couple of years of marriage they conduct their public life together so that Catherine will begin to learn the ropes as to how to conduct herself. And they want to be able to support each other too,” says the spokesperson.

“She’s going to die of boredom in Anglesey,” predicts Wade, who is also fearful of the eight days tour of Canada that Middleton will be dispatched on six weeks after her wedding. The planes at 5am, the crowds, the pressure to look gorgeous all the time. “It’s going to be a shock for her,” she says.

Safe, dutiful and not another Diana; isn’t there a danger that a bored Kate will bore the public? William has a reputation for being adventurous on royal tours and the press desperately hope the couple will prove to be active and interesting. “Hopefully they won’t just be planting trees,” says Jackson.

Vickers says: “If they are to any degree boring that’s quite a good thing. Better to be boring than to be showbusiness. It’s much better when they are plodding around doing their duties than when they are going to parties in Hollywood or Palm Beach polo matches.”

After her day watched by the world, Middleton is unlikely to be a very different person from the Kate of today – and we are unlikely to know her any better. As well as William’s determination to have a private life, the royal family knows that in an era of celebrity their “mystery and mystique” is part of their “enduring appeal”, as a member of the household puts it. “She’s got the rest of her life to be known … members of the royal family are not celebrities.”

Lacey adds: “They are both children of the celebrity era. You see that in their self-assurance in front of cameras and ability to appear natural … But retaining the privacy of their souls is a wiser, more important, attribute. You can see how William learned this through bitter experience but Kate seems to have got it as well.”

Protesters

A protest group with Middle Eastern connections has warned police that it is planning disruptions during the royal wedding this Friday.

As Scotland Yard negotiated with Muslims Against Crusades and the English Defence League over their proposed protests, it emerged that a man from another group, who was understood to have Middle Eastern links but whose identity has not been confirmed, walked into a police station at the weekend to formally apply for permission to demonstrate.

Officers have powers to ban big protests along the main route in London that Prince William and Kate Middleton will take for their wedding, but they are unable to rule out static protests at other nearby locations in the centre of the city.

Six protesters wanted in connection with violence during the TUC marches were arrested in the past week, said police. The six have received bail conditions stopping them from entering central London on the 29 April. Several more arrests are expected as part of covert investigations.

Caroline Davies

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Teenager to become maharaja of Jaipur


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Teenager to become maharaja of Jaipur” was written by Jason Burke in Delhi, for The Guardian on Tuesday 26th April 2011 16.14 UTC

By the time the sun sets over the fabled “pink city” of Jaipur on Wednesday, India will have a new king. The heir to the once independent Rajasthani city and its desert dominions will have succeeded to his throne – and to his heritage of lawsuits, snobbery and palace intrigues – at the age of 13.

Maharaja Padmanabh Singh’s title is not recognised by law since such feudal remnants were swept away by legislation in the early 1970s, but it still inspires respect in this deeply hierarchical country where the aristocracy is venerated despite rapid social change.

However, pending a court decision, the young royal’s wealth and power will be somewhat less magnificent than that of his illustrious predecessors who invited British royalty on tiger hunts.

The estimated £400m family fortune is tied up in lawsuits and the teenage ruler will only be able to control the city palace – though its 30 acres, thousands of rooms, suites, courtyards, museum and elephant stables will bring in ample income.

Many other royal palaces and forts were given or leased to the state government of Rajasthan for token amounts in the aftermath of India’s independence from Britain in 1947.

The new monarch was adopted as heir in 2002 by his grandfather His Highness, First Amongst the Rajas of India, Lord of Princes, Great Prince over Princes, Lieutenant-General Sir Sawai Man Singhji Bahadur the Second, Knight Grand Commander of the Order of the Star of India, Grand Commander of the Order of the Indian Empire, Maharaja of Jaipur.

The late maharaja died last week aged 79. His heir, currently studying at an exclusive Indian public school, lit his funeral pyre after a funeral attended by tens of thousands.

Sawai Man Singhji Bahadur was a flamboyant polo-playing friend of Prince Charles. Known as “bubbles” because of the quantity of champagne consumed to celebrate his birth, his choice of successor was a controversial one as the young crown prince’s father had been a member of the household staff, a clerk according to some reports.

The decision was opposed by the late maharajah’s two step brothers, sparking the ongoing family rift. Hugely complex and drawn out legal manoeuvres have consumed vast sums in lawyers’ fees. “The step family’s not happy when he was made the heir. But [the maharaja] adopted Padmanabh in front of everyone, with a really big ceremony, after completing all the needful legal formalities so there is no way [they] can challenge it now,” said Ramesh Sharma, advocate of the late maharaja.

According to Aman Nath, co-founder of a chain of heritage hotels which include several palaces and forts, the fortunes of India’s hundreds of aristocratic dynasties have been variable, with many struggling to adapt to the changes sweeping the country in recent decades.

“Some royals command respect because of their personal conduct – though it is not easy to play yesterday’s role with relatively empty pockets. Other’s have gone under, with their burdens or bad habits,” Nath told the Times of India newspaper. In today’s India, where social climbing, ostentation and snobbery are key attributes of the newly wealthy middle-classes, titles still retain prestige, though not always the right titles for the right reasons.

The biggest attraction in Jaipur these days is even younger than its new ruler: it is the three-year-old Indian Premier League cricket team the Rajasthan Royals, complete with lycra-clad cheerleaders and who play with highly paid imported stars.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Kate follows in Diana’s stylish footsteps

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Food fit for a prince and his new princess

Tags:

Royal death in India

Indian city mourns last maharaja of Jaipur

Tags: ,

Akihito and Michiko welcome visitor

Emperor and Empress meet Hillary Clinton (video)

Beatrix, Willem Alexander & Maxima in Germany

Dutch royals finish visit to Germany (video)

A day in the life of a royal journalist

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Tags:

Kate wedding dress ‘will be future of high-street fashion’


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Kate Middleton wedding dress ‘will be future of high-street fashion’” was written by Rowenna Davis, for The Observer on Saturday 23rd April 2011 23.06 UTC

It is one of the biggest secrets in the country, and one with potentially huge ramifications for the British high street: who has designed Kate Middleton’s wedding dress?

Increasingly loud rumours that the royal wedding dress could be the work of lesser-known designer Sophie Cranston – founder of the label Libelula – forced the company to issue a denial last week, at which point the speculative spotlight shone upon Sarah Burton of Alexander McQueen, Bruce Oldfield, Phillipa Lepley and Alice Temperley.

The bride-to-be’s choice is expected to have huge repercussions as high street stores prepare to satisfy a generation of mini-Kates seeking to replicate the future queen.

Cranston started Libelula – which means dragonfly in Spanish – in 2002. Middleton is already a fan of her designs, most recently wearing a black velvet dress coat to a friend’s wedding in January. Her vintage-inspired aesthetic, which often focuses on 1920s and 1930s styles, has slim, bias-cut silhouettes that flatter narrow frames, and seems in keeping with Middleton’s style.

But with so much riding on it, many fashion insiders are hoping that Kate has chosen the boldest design house in the running, Alexander McQueen. McQueen’s successor, Sarah Burton, who has dressed the likes of Lady Gaga and Cate Blanchett, would make a daring choice for the conservative bride-to-be.

“There is obviously a huge amount of speculation and gossip, but personally I think it would be amazing if she wore McQueen,” says Sarah Clark, senior fashion editor at Glamour magazine. “It would definitely be a bold choice for Kate. The fashion house is known for being dramatic and contemporary, so it would make a real statement.

“Of course, any designer Kate chooses to wear will immediately become a household name – the coverage will be unbelievable. It will catapult that designer into the mainstream. It’s hard to overestimate the impact.”

The Kate Middleton brand is already worth millions. After her shopping trip in Chelsea last week, sales of short-sleeved black dresses rocketed by 90%, according to price comparison website StyleCompare. Sales of brown bags saw a similar 60% upturn at retailers such as Radley and Paul’s Boutique.

Similarly, the blue silk Issa dress she wore to announce her engagement last November catapulted Brazilian designer Daniella Helayel to global fame. In a further bout of Middleton fever, Whistles and Reiss had to reissue the dress and cream silk blouse Kate wore in her engagement photos. Sales of her familiar black knee-high boots have soared, and Debenhams has announced its £6 replica of her engagement ring is set to become its fastest-selling piece of jewellery.

Julia Rebaudo, style expert at StyleCompare, said that if Middleton chose the softer, more feminine designer Alice Temperley, we would be likely to see scalloped edges, beading and hand embroidery replicated on the high street.

“If Kate goes with Alexander McQueen then we can expect a structured statement piece, but infused with Burton’s touch of femininity. But if she goes with Alice Temperley we could be looking at something slightly more deconstructed, romantic and bohemian – a style that would easily translate to the high street and would definitely be picked up on.”

The other designers said to be in the running produce more classical dresses. Jasper Conran and Bruce Oldfield were among Princess Diana’s favourites, but their designs are more traditional and understated. Fashion experts say Middleton will try to distance herself from the Diana legacy and that could make her even more popular.

“Kate is synonymous with the British high street, in a way that Princess Diana never was, which definitely adds to her appeal as a modern princess. Her style is accessible,” says Clark. “She shops in high street stores such as Whistles and Warehouse and she used to work at Jigsaw. She always looks chic and polished, but admits she’s not obsessed with current trends.”

Middleton’s more conservative style may be more fitting in the current economic climate, said Clare Coulson, of Harper’s Bazaar magazine. “Princess Diana’s wedding dress was very much a design of the moment; blowsy big sleeves and romantic Laura Ashley-style dresses spread everywhere on the high street. Of course in our recession it’s harder to have an impact – Kate can’t look excessive, but in the abbey you still need to make a bold statement.”

One thing’s for certain, Middleton will have to choose a British designer, so up-and-coming homegrown talents are looking to her choice with interest. Independent designer 26-year-old Rosa Hirsch-Holland, who runs her own cult label, Rosa Bloom, says she is intrigued by what choice Kate will make. “If she goes for something a little off-the-wall, then it could certainly inspire customers who would normally play it safe to seek out something with a bit more edge,” said Hirsch-Holland.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Monarchy still broadly relevant, Britons say


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Monarchy still broadly relevant, Britons say” was written by Julian Glover, for The Guardian on Sunday 24th April 2011 16.09 UTC

Britain is a nation made up of moderate monarchists and reluctant republicans, according to a Guardian/ICM poll. More people are looking forward to an extra day off work than watching the royal wedding – but support for the monarchy has nonetheless climbed notably since the crisis following Princess Diana’s death. The country is in no mood for a revolution.

The poll shows a large majority think the monarchy is still relevant to national life, makes Britain more respected around the world and is better than any alternative. But there seems to be tolerant scepticism rather than royalist hysteria around the wedding itself.

Only 37% agree that they are genuinely interested in the wedding, while 46% say they are not. Women are much more likely to be interested than men, and only 18% of all people questioned say they are strongly interested in the event.

Even so, 47% agree they will probably watch it on television this Friday, including a majority of women and people aged 18-24. Almost the same proportion, 49%, say they are more excited by the idea of an extra bank holiday than the wedding – only 31% disagree.

The poll includes some questions proposed by Guardian readers online, among them the suggestion that the wedding will boost the nation’s feelgood factor at a time of economic uncertainty. Almost everyone, monarchist or not, agrees that the wedding will cheer Britain up: 75% say yes, only 17% no. That may be one reason why the poll seems to dash republican hopes that the monarchy is becoming an outmoded institution. Instead support for the crown, if anything, is growing.

More people think the monarchy is a unifying national institution than one that divides the country and reinforces the class system. Almost half those questioned, 47%, say it is a unifying force, against 36% who think it a divisive one. Only among Labour supporters do more people think it divisive than unifying.

And despite all the celebrity hype surrounding the wedding, only 32% think the event is more about glamour and celebrity than British values (52%).

More people think the crown should pass directly to Prince William rather than Prince Charles, 46% to 40%. But most people also think there is nothing wrong with having to call a member of the royal family “your highness”: 64% approve of the practice and only 29% do not.

So the age of deference is not quite dead. There’s also a strong shared national belief that the monarchy is something that improves Britain’s image around the world. While 60% say it does, only 2% think it definitely does the opposite, with 36% saying it makes little difference either way.

More significant, perhaps, are changing attitudes to the monarchy’s place in British life. A strong majority among people of all political persuasions and social groups think that Britain would be worse off without the monarchy. While just 26% think the country would be better off getting rid of the royal family, 63% say the opposite.

There has been a small regrowth in royalist support since the nadir following Princess Diana’s death. In August 1997 a Guardian/ICM poll found that only 48% thought the country would be worse off without the crown, 15 points lower than now. By August 1998, that had risen to 62%, one point lower than now. Despite massive political and economic shifts in the decade since then, attitudes to the monarchy seem almost static.

There is hope, though, for republicans in the fact that the most enthusiastic supporters of the monarchy are pensioners, and young people are less keen. Among 19-24s, 37% think Britain would be better off without the monarchy, 10 points higher than the average.

Even so, 67% of all people – including 73% of women and 57% of 18-24s – think the monarchy is relevant to life in Britain today. Only 32% disagree. Again, there has been almost no shift in opinion over the last 10 years. In May 2002 a Guardian/ICM poll found that 66% saw the monarchy as relevant and 33% thought not – figures almost identical to the ones in this month’s poll.

As for the future, the Queen’s death could make a big difference to attitudes. Almost everyone, 89%, thinks Britain will still have a monarch in 10 year’s time – but that belief drops sharply when people are asked about the next 50 and 100 years.

A narrow majority, 57%, think there will be a place for a British monarch in 50 years but only 40% think William and Kate’s descendants will still be on the throne in 2111.

Even so, confidence in the future of the monarchy has grown since 1997: then only 38% thought there would be a monarch in 50 years time and just 26% thought the crown would survive the next century, 14 points lower than today.

There’s also a widespread feeling that a monarch such as the Queen should retire rather than cling on if they cease to be mentally or physically capable. While 64% think the monarch should retire, only 31% do not.

ICM Research interviewed a random sample of 1,003 adults across the United Kingdom aged 18 and over by telephone on 15-17 April 2011. Interviews were conducted across the country and the results have been weighted to the profile of all adults.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.