News from the Netherlands

Turning a palace into a museum (video)

Queen’s visit to Ireland could mark start of new era

Note: This article is from the Guardian.


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Queen’s visit to Ireland could mark the start of a new era, says Gerry Adams” was written by Henry McDonald, Ireland editor, for The Observer on Saturday 14th May 2011 23.19 UTC

Gerry Adams, the leader of Sinn Féin, has said that the Queen’s visit to Ireland could mark moves towards a new and better relationship between the country and Britain.

His remarks come as an unprecedented security operation gets under way in the Republic to protect the Queen from terrorist attacks or street disorder. The public will be kept back from the royal entourage as it passes along Dublin’s quays, north of the river Liffey and the city’s main thoroughfare, O’Connell Street.

Adams, the Sinn Féin president, said the three-day royal tour could provide “a unique opportunity” for mutual respect and equality on both sides of the Irish Sea.

His comments, in a column for the Irish Examiner, mark a change in his attitude to the historic visit. He said he had nothing against the Queen but he was opposed to the idea of monarchies in principle. He hoped the visit would hasten the day when a new and better relationship could be formed, but that would depend on what the Queen said.

Adams maintained that the visit was troubling for many people and found suggestions that the state visit was an indication that Irish people had matured insulting and patronising. In March, the Sinn Féin president had described the visit as premature.

His comments came as security forces on both sides of the border began a clampdown on republican dissidents who have vowed to disrupt the visit. In Northern Ireland, police arrested a man and a woman in Co Armagh in connection with dissident republican activity. Detectives from the PSNI’s serious crime branch held a man of 25 in Lurgan and a woman of 26 in Armagh. Both are being questioned under the Terrorism Act.

Meanwhile, former IRA hunger striker and Old Bailey bomber Marian Price is still being quizzed about dissident republican actions by the PSNI. She was arrested at her west Belfast home on Friday.

Price was seen at Easter standing beside a masked Real IRA man at a dissident republican commemoration in Derry. She has been a bitter critic of Adams’s and Sinn Féin’s peace strategy, regarding their stance as a sell-out of traditional republican principles.

South of the border the Garda Síochána is continuing preparations for the arrival of the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh. More than 30 streets in central Dublin will have parking restrictions imposed, and these will remain in place all week. Up to 5,000 gardaí will be deployed on security duties to protect the royal couple. The force also has a number of water cannon in reserve, borrowed from the PSNI.

Barriers will remain in place throughout the royal visit and will keep the public away from the royal party, which will travel through the city in bulletproof cars.

Thousands of manholes covers and lamp-posts along the route through Dublin have already been checked and sealed as part of the security operation. Traffic restrictions on some routes through the city will begin on Monday.

Senior Garda sources, meanwhile, have expressed concern over the continuing ability of dissident republicans to acquire sophisticated new arms from sources abroad. They point to the seizure of a new type of mortar rocket launcher at Dublin airport at Christmas. The weapon is more accurate and has a greater range than launchers used in previous attacks on police stations in Northern Ireland.

In a series of follow-up operations, the Garda has also uncovered a new type of Russian explosive which the Real IRA is believed to have smuggled into the Republic within the past two years.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Royal wedding boosts sales of six UK papers


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Royal wedding boosts sales of six national papers” was written by Josh Halliday, for guardian.co.uk on Friday 13th May 2011 12.27 UTC

The royal wedding gave UK national newspapers a welcome boost in circulation for April, with six titles recording sales increases.

The Daily Mail and Daily Express benefited from the marriage of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge on 29 April. The Mail was the only national newspaper to record a month-on-month and year-on-year sales increase.

The mid-market titles saw the largest month-on-month increase of all the national dailes, with the Daily Mail recording a 2.97% circulation increase, to 2,100,3000, and the Daily Express rising 2.41% to 635,576.

The good cheer was shared with four other national daily newspapers, which also boosted sales last month.

The Daily Telegraph jumped 2.1% on the previous month, to 639,578. The Daily Mirror, the Guardian and the Times also recorded a month-on-month sales increase.

The Independent was the only mass market quality title not to see a sales uplift last month, falling 0.65% on the previous month to 180,743. Among the tabloids, the Daily Star and The Sun each dropped sales by just over 1%.

The Independent’s smaller sister paper, the cut-price i, continued to drop sales following its high-profile advertising campaign featuring Dom Joly and Jemima Khan.

Alexander Lebedev’s i recorded the biggest month-on-month circulation decline among national daily titles, slumping 6% to 161,151.

Daily Telegraph

Headline circulation: 639,578

Month-on-month change: 2.10%

Year-on-year change: -6.39%

Overseas: 24,043

The Times

Headline circulation: 449,809

Month-on-month change: 0.83%

Year-on-year change: -11.28%

Overseas: 19,917

Financial Times

Headline circulation: 372,076

Month-on-month change: -2.51%

Year-on-year change: -3.75%

UK and Ireland paid-for circulation: 73,152 (22.4% of total)

Overseas: 265,291

The Guardian

Headline circulation: 263,907

Month-on-month change: 1.07%

Year-on-year change: -8.66%

UK and Ireland paid-for circulation: 246,700 (93.5% of total)

Overseas: 17,206

The Independent

Headline circulation: 180,743

Month-on-month change: -0.65%

Year-on-year change: -3.92%

UK and Ireland paid-for circulation: 83,264 (46% of total)

Overseas: 23,701

Daily Mail

Headline circulation: 2,100,300

Month-on-month change: 2.97%

Year-on-year change: 0.2%

UK and Ireland paid-for circulation: 1,885,453 (89.7% of total)

Overseas: 94,042

Daily Express

Headline circulation: 635,576

Month-on-month change: 2.41%

Year-on-year change: -4.53%

Overseas: 30,456

The Sun

Headline circulation: 2,783,110

Month-on-month change: -1.23%

Year-on-year change: -5.85%

Overseas: 43,700

Daily Mirror

Headline circulation: 1,172,785

Month-on-month change: 1.46%

Year-on-year change: -5.40%

Overseas: 34,474

Daily Star

Headline circulation: 692,157

Month-on-month change: -1.01%

Year-on-year change: -15.90%

Overseas: 15,708

Headline circulation includes lesser rate sales, subscriptions, bulks – copies sold to airlines, rail companies, hotels and gyms for a nominal fee and given free to the public – and distribution in Ireland and overseas. UK and Ireland paid-for circulation excludes bulks and overseas distribution; where this figure is not given, bulks and overseas distribution account for less than 5% of total circulation

• To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”.

• To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter at http://twitter.com/#!/mediaguardian and Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/mediaguardian

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Queen set for first Republic of Ireland visit


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Queen set for first Republic of Ireland visit” was written by Stephen Bates and Henry McDonald, for The Guardian on Friday 13th May 2011 17.36 UTC

The Queen has visited 129 countries in the course of the second longest reign in British history, from Iceland to Indonesia, but never has she ever set foot in the 130th: Britain’s nearest neighbour, the Republic of Ireland.

Her four-day visit from Tuesday will be the first by a British monarch since her grandfather, George V, was greeted by cheering crowds in Dublin almost 100 years ago in the boiling hot July of 1911, and the Irish government has been playing down the resonances that many still feel.

However, demonstrations are expected and the government has instituted a huge security operation, targeted dissident republicans and borrowed water cannon from the Police Service of Northern Ireland.

Eamon Gilmore, the tánaiste (deputy prime minister) and foreign minister, told the Guardian: “It is very historic and symbolic that the Queen is coming, but really there should be a lot of surprise that it hasn’t happened before.

“She is the head of state of a neighbouring country and state visits are very much part of what we do. She will get a very warm welcome. Her visit will herald a much more normal relationship between Ireland and the UK.”

Gilmore, who in his youth was a member of Official Sinn Féin, the non-violent wing of the republican movement that became the Workers’ party, says he will greet her on arrival, but not bow. Asked if he ever thought he would be welcoming the Queen to Ireland, he replies: “I think it is a question of an old book opening a new chapter … She is going to be welcomed by the overwhelming majority. Those who are opposed do not represent a significant slice of opinion.”

The visit – which will be accompanied for part of the time by David Cameron and William Hague, the foreign secretary – will carry the panoply of a state occasion: a formal dinner, a visit to the Dáil and meetings with the president, Mary McAleese, and taoiseach, Enda Kenny, but also includes a trip to the national horse stud in Kildare and the English market in Cork.

It ends three days before the arrival of Barack Obama, who will be stopping over for 24 hours to visit his Irish family roots in Moneygall, County Offaly, on his way to a state visit to Britain.

But the Queen’s visit is laden with reminders of a fraught and violent past century. She will lay a wreath at the Garden of Remembrance in Dublin, built to honour those killed fighting for Irish freedom, from the 1798 rebellion of the United Irishmen to the Easter Rising and the Irish war of independence of 1919-21.

And, most resonant of all, she has been invited to Croke Park, where British auxiliary troops fired on a crowd at a gaelic football match in November 1920, killing 14, in savage reprisal for the IRA’s assassination of undercover agents in Dublin earlier that morning. It is not so very long since no Briton could have set foot there, let alone a British monarch.

Eirígí, the Irish republican socialist movement, has pointed out that the Queen will arrive on the 37th anniversary of Ulster Volunteer Force bombings in Dublin. Anniversaries and historic wrongs remain important. Brian Leeson, the Eirígí spokesman, said: “For as long as the British occupation of the six counties continues the prospect of a British head of state attending a ceremony at the Garden of Remembrance is as insulting as it is provocative. The entire spectacle is nothing short of disgusting.”

Officials expect the visit to produce large crowds and worldwide attention. About 5,000 Garda Síochána officers will be on duty. Senior sources in the Garda have criticised the Irish government’s decision to publish the itinerary in advance, believing it has given dissidents time to organise demonstrations. Republican Sinn Féin, linked to the terror group the Continuity IRA, plans protests throughout the visit.

The biggest confrontation may come at the Garden of Remembrance. One security source said: “The demonstrators will only be 300 to 400 yards away. This is the biggest test. The force has to repel any attempt to break through and this is where they will try their damndest.”

The special branch has rounded up dissident ringleaders and made arrests.

The government – and the Irish tourist board – hope that the visits by the Queen and Obama will lift spirits after months of political turmoil and financial crisis, and boost tourism from Britain and the US. Alex Connolly, Failte Ireland’s spokesman, said: “The Queen’s visit brings us exposure money can’t buy.”

At the end of his visit to Dublin in 1911, George V was surprised by the warmth of the welcome he had received – a “natural impulse of goodwill and true Irish welcome we shall never forget”.

He declared: “Looking forward as we do to coming amongst our Irish people again and at no distant date … we can now only say that our best wishes will ever be for the increased prosperity of your ancient capital and for the contentment and happiness of our Irish people.” He could never have realised “no distant date” would take another century.

Royal visits

Royal visits to their Irish realm were not uncommon in the late 19th and early 20th century, despite rising political tensions over home rule. After Edward VII’s visit in 1903, the nationalist Cork Examiner declared: “No sovereign visiting our shores ever met with anything like the hearty goodwill, the honest, unaffected welcome extended by the people of all classes. This fortnight has made history … provided materials for nation building.”

When George V paid what would be the last official visit in 1911, the king noted that he and Queen Mary had received a reception “as warm-hearted and enthusiastic as any that he has ever received.”

Dublin Corporation’s nationalist members voted to play no part, but the king was greeted by thousands of spectators, lining the eight miles from Kingstown – now Dun Laoghaire – to the city centre and received loyal addresses from 130 organisations. Lord Mayor John Farrell told the Manchester Guardian that the king would receive a heartier reception in Dublin than he would get in London as “the Irish people were peculiarly suited by temperament to express a welcome when they had it in their hearts.”

Resorting to quoting his cabbie, the paper’s correspondent reported: “My jarvey told me with the air of one who had known him from the cradle that King George was a very decent fellow and he went on to assure me that the Irish people, coming as they did from very decent stock themselves, would give him the welcome that he deserved.”

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Phone hacking: James Hewitt & Koo Stark ‘to sue’

Note: This article is from the Guardian. I am not allowed to make any changes to the text, but I have been informed that the correct spelling of the name of Ms Stark’s barrister is Andrew Veen.


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “Phone hacking: James Hewitt to sue News of the World” was written by James Robinson and Mark Sweney, for guardian.co.uk on Friday 13th May 2011 17.01 UTC

James Hewitt, the former army officer who became famous for his affair with Princess Diana, is poised to sue the News of the World for invasion of privacy.

He is the latest in a long line of celebrities and public figures to take legal action against the paper over phone hacking.

Hewitt will issue proceedings next week after the Metropolitan police showed him evidence that suggests he may have been targeted by Glenn Mulcaire, the private investigator who was jailed for hacking into mobile phone voicemail messages in 2007.

The paper’s owner News Group, part of Rupert Murdoch’s media empire, has since been sued by more than 20 celebrities in the high court, along with Mulcaire himself.

Hewitt’s lawyer Charlotte Harris of Mishcon de Reya, confirmed that Hewitt is poised to begin action against the paper: “He’s had his meeting with the police, we’re satisfied he has a strong case and we will be issuing legal proceedings next week,” she said.

Harris also represents Sky Andrew, a football agent who is also suing the paper.

Celebrity publicist Max Clifford claimed on Friday that Koo Stark, a former girlfriend of Prince Andrew, is also poised to sue a tabloid newspaper over phone hacking, although it is unclear which title he was referring to. When contacted by the Guardian, her lawyer Andrew Veer said he could not comment at this stage.

Clifford said his understanding was that the title was not part of the News International stable, which includes the Sun, the Times and Sunday Times.

“She approached me some time ago saying she is convinved her phone was tapped when she was with Prince Andrew,” he said. “She wanted her to put me in touch with lawyers and she has been taking legal advice. I won’t say who she thinks it was, but it wasn’t News International”.

Another high-profile litigant, actor Sienna Miller, accepted £100,000 compensation from News of the World on Friday after the paper accepted unconditional liability for all her phone-hacking claims.

The unexpected agreement came midway through her own high court battle with the paper.

Miller is the first celebrity to settle their claim since the tabloid admitted hacking the mobile phones of eight public figures last month, apologised and offered to pay damages and legal costs.

Hewitt was the subject of hundreds of tabloid stories long after Diana’s death in 1997. He sold his story to the News of the World in the mid-1990s in a deal that netted him £1m, according to some reports, but the amount he received was never confirmed.

In 2004, he was arrested after he was found to be in possession of cocaine in a London bar.

The Metropolitan police are in the process of alerting hundreds of people whose names and mobile phone details were found in notebooks belonging to Mulcaire as part of a fresh investigation into phone hacking which began at the start of the year. They were seized in a police raid on his home in 2006 along with other documents, including his phone records and address books.

That evidence forms the basis of the claims currently being pursued in the high court.

News International, News Group’s UK parent company, is trying to settle those cases before they go to trial. But a number of new cases or about to begin, with several other famous figures considering taking legal action.

They include Heather Mills, Sir Paul McCartney’s ex-wife, Manchester United and England footballer Wayne Rooney and his agent Paul Stretford.

• To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”.

• To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

Prince at royal ploughing ceremony in Thailand

Below: A Thai official dressed in a traditional costume greets Thailand’s Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn (right) during an annual royal ploughing ceremony in Bangkok on May 13. The ceremony marks the start of the rice-planting season.

A Thai official dressed in a traditional costume greets Thailand’s Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn (R) during an annual royal ploughing ceremony in cental Bangkok May 13, 2011. The ancient ploughing ceremony in Buddhist Thailand, overseen by Crown Prince Maha Vajiralongkorn, marks the end of the dry season and is meant to herald an auspicious start for the rice-planting season for the world biggest rice exporter. REUTERS/Damir Sagolj (THAILAND – Tags: ROYALS AGRICULTURE SOCIETY)

Spanish royals at memorial for quake dead

No bows or curtsies when the Queen visits Ireland

Note: This article is from the Guardian.


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “No bows or curtsies when the Queen pays historic visit to Ireland” was written by Nicholas Watt, for guardian.co.uk on Thursday 12th May 2011 23.21 UTC

When the Queen becomes the first British monarch in 100 years to visit Dublin next Tuesday she will receive a typically warm Irish welcome.

But even before she disembarks from her plane at the Baldonnel military airbase the Queen will have her first taste of the troubled history of Anglo-Irish relations.

From her plane the Queen will see that the base’s formal title is the Casement Aerodrome. It was named after Sir Roger Casement, a member of the Anglo-Irish ascendancy who turned into an Irish nationalist hero after he was hanged for treason at Pentonville Prison in London a few months after the 1916 Easter Rising in Dublin. Casement, who once served as British consul-general in Rio de Janeiro, had negotiated with Germany to ship arms to Irish Republicans during the first world war. He famously returned to Ireland on a submarine.

No doubt Casement’s treason will not be mentioned when the Queen is formally welcomed at the airport by Eamon Gilmore, the deputy prime minister (Tánaiste). But Gilmore will not be bowing to the Queen. Irish republicans tend not to bow or curtsy to a British monarch.

The Queen is likely to be supremely relaxed by the absence of bows and curtsies. The atmosphere will be wholly different to the time when Paul Keating, the former Australian prime minister, committed lese-majesty by placing his arm round the Queen. On visits down under she is Queen of Australia.

During her four-day visit to the Irish Republic the Queen will be a foreign head of state, enjoying the same status as Barack Obama who will visit the following week. But the Queen’s visit will be laden with symbolism as the granddaughter of King George V, the last British monarch to visit Dublin in 1911, sets the seal on the full normalisation of Anglo-Irish relations after a political settlement was finally reached in Northern Ireland.

As I wrote in a recent blog the visit has been carefully balanced to reflect the complexity of relations between the two islands.

The Queen will take part in a wreath-laying ceremony on the first day of her visit at the Garden of Remembrance in Dublin that commemorates the Irish republicans who tried to overthrow George V’s rule over Ireland in the Easter Rising. The visit to the shrine of Irish nationalism will be balanced on Wednesday when the Queen takes part in a wreath laying ceremony at the Irish War Memorial Garden, Islandbridge, in Dublin. This commemorates Irish soldiers who died in British or allied uniforms during the first and second world wars.

David Cameron will show this is no ordinary state visit when he joins the Queen in Dublin on Wednesday. William Hague will follow precedent by accompanying the Queen for the whole visit. But the prime minister will show this is one of the most special state visits of the Queen’s reign when he attends a banquet at Dublin Castle, the former seat of British rule, where she will deliver her only speech of the visit. This has been pored over in the Foreign Office and Downing Street.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

The Middletons battle for privacy

Note: This article is from the Guardian.


Powered by Guardian.co.ukThis article titled “William and the Middletons: the battle for privacy” was written by Stephen Bates, for The Guardian on Wednesday 11th May 2011 19.00 UTC

Few things happen on Anglesey these days without the national media being informed, so when two cars, including a police Range Rover piled high with luggage, were seen being driven off the island on Monday afternoon it was a fair bet that Prince William and his duchess were finally starting their honeymoon, 10 days after the royal wedding. Herewith starts the latest game of cat and mouse – with the couple the mice and the pursuing moggies, laden with cameras, trying to spot which particular hole they are bolting for. The Seychelles seems the winner. It’s nice at this time of year, especially in a £4,000 a night beach hotel.

But events over the past few days indicate the paparazzi may not have things all their own way. A shot has already been aimed across their path with an official complaint by the Middleton family over publication of five-year-old photographs showing Kate Middleton and her younger sister, Pippa – and their mother, Carole – in bikinis relaxing on board a yacht while on holiday with William and others off Ibiza in 2006. They are eerily reminiscent of Princess Diana’s last holiday with Dodi Fayed on a yacht in 1997.

The pictures, supplied by a London freelance agency, are grainy, long-distance and clearly unauthorised and some have apparently been published before, but what has given them special resonance now with the tabloids – the News of the World, Mail on Sunday, Daily Mail and Daily Mirror published them – is that they include not just Kate Middleton, but also Pippa, who has become a sudden media star since wearing That Dress as bridesmaid at That Wedding. If one “wisteria sister” has married her prince, the second now also climbs into the sunlight. Even her bottom has its own appreciative website.

What prompted the Middletons’ complaint about the invasion of their privacy was not the lubricious commentary about Pippa’s “now world-famous rear admirable” but probably the News of the World’s decision to push things too far by publishing a picture showing a silhouette of one of her breasts as she took off her bikini top.

The newspapers all trumpeted that their pictures were exclusive, or “never seen before”, which may prove a strategic mistake, especially if they subsequently claim that, as pictures from the yacht party have been published before without complaint, they have not intruded into the family’s privacy now. It is difficult to have it both ways. The fact that Pippa, who was 22 then and is 27 now, was not the focus of attention in those days is no excuse: she still has a right to privacy, particularly if the yacht was discreetly positioned.

The Press Complaints Commission was insisting yesterday that the Middletons have as much right to a private life as any other members of the public – “the same as everybody else, from prince to commoner, in terms of their expectation of privacy” – but, of course, the Middletons are no longer just anybody, just as William was not any old student when the papers respected his privacy as a student at Eton, then St Andrews.

The PCC has been quietly protecting them for some time, though it would hate to admit it and has only occasionally broken cover. Editors regularly get quiet letters of prior restraint and pointed reminders of the journalists’ code of practice, which prohibits “persistence in questioning, telephoning, pursuing or photographing individuals once asked to desist, nor remaining on their property when asked to leave and must not follow them”.

By and large that has meant that pictures such as one of Kate Middleton on a tennis court and another of her at a family Christmas, taken through a window, have not seen the light of day in Britain. On the one previous occasion that a formal complaint was lodged, against the Daily Mirror in March 2007 after it published a photograph of her in the street carrying a cup of coffee, the paper published a grovelling mea culpa, or in the PCC’s terms “a prompt, public expression of regret and admission of error”. Its editor, Richard Wallace, said then, only slightly querulously: “We published an innocuous picture of Miss Middleton walking down the street with a cup of coffee. It was taken by a freelance photographer in circumstances where we were later told she felt harassed. We got it wrong and we sincerely regret that.”

But even in the past few weeks there have been other informal complaints. On 7 April, Carole and Pippa told the PCC that they had been harassed while out shopping in London by agency photographers riding mopeds, and even on the morning of the wedding itself the PCC was recording its satisfaction that the Daily Mail had withdrawn inaccurate references to James Middleton, Kate’s brother, from a story on its website. The old strapline that the Sun likes to put on its exclusives to warn off rivals, “Our lawyers are watching”, springs to mind.

It is not only the press that likes to have its cake and eat it, however: no complaint has been received about pictures published in several papers last Friday showing Kate Middleton pushing a shopping trolley in the carpark outside the Anglesey Waitrose – pictures taken by several photographers according to the bylines. Was the calculation that they were taken in a public place, or that they happily conveyed the fiction that the duchess is really just a services’ wife who knows all about doing the weekly shopping while her husband is hard at work rescuing walkers taken ill on Snowdonia?

If so, that may be a step on from Princess Diana’s early experience of married life in 1981 when she was photographed popping out to the shops to buy some sweets. The Queen called in editors to make a quiet plea for her daughter-in-law’s privacy, only to be asked by Barry Askew, the editor of the News of the World, why they didn’t just send out a servant to buy them? “That was a pompous remark Mr Askew,” Her Majesty remarked and he was ousted within weeks. Thirty years on, both sides are more savvy – but don’t expect the media’s fascination to be too constrained. However remote the honeymoon is, if there is a good enough picture there will be buyers somewhere.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010

Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.

British royal news