Queen opens fourth session of Scottish parliament
This article titled “Queen opens fourth session of Scottish parliament” was written by Kirsty Scott, for guardian.co.uk on Friday 1st July 2011 13.29 UTCThe Queen officially opened the fourth session of the Scottish parliament and told Holyrood it had “truly come of age”.
Addressing politicians and dignitaries who had gathered in Edinburgh for a day of celebrations, the monarch drew laughter as she said: “No one would ever argue that Scottish politics is the business of the meek, the passive or faint-hearted.”
She added: “Now in its second decade, the Scottish parliament is firmly established as an integral part of Scottish public life. The maturity of the legislation passed in this chamber, and the well-tested processes given rise to, are evidence that the Scottish parliament has truly come of age.
“This is an achievement of which all members past and present should be proud. To the new and returning members if the Scottish parliament, I offer the observation that, in return for the authority placed upon you, a very great deal is asked of Scotland’s elected politicians – perhaps as much now as ever before.”
The Queen’s visit comes two months after the Scottish National party swept to victory in Holyrood elections, winning enough seats to enable it to call a referendum on Scotland’s independence.
Scotland’s first minister, Alex Salmond – referring to the monarch as the “Queen of Scots” – said that, whatever constitutional path the Scots chose, they would remain “firm friends and equal partners” with the rest of the UK.
“This is a country increasingly comfortable in its own skin,” he said. “We aspire to be more successful, more dynamic, fairer and greener. We want to protect the vulnerable, nurture the young. We want to emerge from current economic difficulties into better times.”
The opening ceremony also included a programme of Scottish music and poetry as part of a wider celebration featuring a “riding” of the Royal Mile, a military procession and an open day for the public inside the parliament building.
The day’s events got under way with the ancient crown of Scotland, which dates back to 1540, being carried to the parliament and placed in the debating chamber prior to the Queen’s arrival. As the monarch entered the chamber, fanfares were played by state trumpeters.
Following her address, the Queen, who was accompanied by the Duke of Edinburgh, moved to the main hall to meet some of the subjects from Holyrood’s travelling exhibition, Moving Stories, which tells the stories of 10 members of the public who have been involved with the parliament in various ways, and also viewed the parliament’s official portrait of her.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010
Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.
Alex Salmond: We’ll keep the Queen
Note: This article is from the Guardian.
The Queen, who is on something of a roll after her triumphant state visit to Ireland and the arrival of Barack Obama in London, has just won a new fan.
Alex Salmond, the first minister of Scotland, has just given a gushing interview about the Queen in which he raises an intriguing prospect. The SNP leader tells Prospect magazine that an independent Scotland would keep the Queen as head of state while England would be better off as a republic.
Salmond indicated some time ago that an independent Scotland would keep the Queen as head of state. But the increasingly assertive – and mischievous – Salmond suggests that Scotland would be more confident than England about holding onto the monarchy because it takes a different approach to social class.
Prospect has just issued a press release about Salmond’s interview with James Macintyre, the magazine’s politics editor:
“There is a better case for an English republic than a Scottish one,” he says. Mainstream Scotland, in his view, is not anti-monarchy, because the royals don’t define a Scots class structure as they do in England. “I’m not saying Scotland is a classless society,” he says, “but I still think inequalities in Scotland are not generally linked to the monarchy.”
Salmond said he loved the royal wedding, which he attended, because it broke the traditional “English reserve” and ushered in a “carnival-like atmosphere” which he likens to Hogmanay. He says he “missed a trick” after failing to plaster Edinburgh in royal colours:
I was too busy with the campaign but I should have had this entire city – I would have had – covered in royal standards.
Salmond’s remarks are no doubt designed to reassure Scots who feel uncomfortable about severing ancient links if Scotland becomes independent. The SNP leader appears to have no intention of restoring the House of Stuart, which provided Scotland’s monarch, in its days as a sovereign state. (Even if he wanted to it would be tricky to place a Stuart on the throne).
Between 1603 and 1707 England and Scotland technically shared a monarch after the Union of the Crowns in 1603 which led to James VI of Scotland also becoming James I of England. In 1707, when the English and Scottish parliaments each passed an Act of Union, the Kingdom of Great Britain was created.
Queen Anne, who was the last Queen of England and Scotland (1702-07) and the first Queen of Great Britain and Ireland (1707 until her death in 1714) was the last member of the House of Stuart to sit on the throne. On her death the House of Hanover, in the form of King George I, took over.
But Salmond indicated there would be no return for the House of Stuart when he made clear that the current Queen, from the House of Windsor, would be Queen of Scotland. This became clear in an exchange in the Independent in 2007:
Q: Will the Queen continue to be Queen of an independent Scotland, as the direct descendant of James VI? Or will you reinstate the Stuarts? LAURA CORDON, Lewisham, London
A: The Queen will be Elizabeth of Scotland in the same way as she is Queen today in Canada, Australia and a host of other Commonwealth nations.
Salmond’s suggestion to Prospect that England could break from the crown, while Scotland would keep the House of Windsor, is no doubt designed to irritate the English establishment. London probably hopes that England, Wales and Northern Ireland (assuming Unionists maintain their majority there) will be regarded at the UN as the successor state to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in the way that Russia became the successor state to the Soviet Union. That might look a bit strange if the Salmond scenario comes true.
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010
Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.
Call to bring Bothwell back to Scotland
The article below is from The Guardian.
Elizabeth I was said to fear him as the one man whose allegiance she could never buy. At one point he was the only Scottish nobleman not on her payroll. And after his death, the mention of his name could still reduce her cousin, Mary Queen of Scots, to tears.
Now a new book claims that history has much maligned James Hepburn, the 4th Earl of Bothwell (1534-1578). It argues that he was in fact another Braveheart who deserves a place alongside Celtic heroes such as Robert the Bruce and William Wallace. And, spurred on by the prospect of a full and glorious rehabilitation for the 16th-century Scot who died a horrible death in exile in Denmark, one of his descendants is campaigning to repatriate his body.
Bothwell, the third husband of Mary Stuart – the young Scots queen who lost her throne and later her head – was portrayed by his enemies as a control freak who killed Lord Darnley, Mary’s previous husband, and dominated the young queen, kidnapping her and forcing her into marriage.
In fact, says renowned French historian Catherine Hermary-Vieille, Bothwell is a misunderstood hero who adored Mary, pretended to abduct the already pregnant queen to save her reputation, was her only true love and was simply disliked by jealous courtiers who lied about him.
“Much of what we had been told about him was through the accounts of people who disliked him, who were unreliable witnesses at a time when everyone was plotting or in a counter-plot,” says Hermary-Vieille.
“These Scottish lords were tough; they had feuds they fought for generations after everyone else had long forgotten what they were about, so to find a man like this of such character, so loyal to the queen and to Scotland, he was the only one. He was the last great patriot of an independent Scotland. It’s a pity history and the Scots do not remember him as such.”
Hermary-Vieille’s book, Lord James, has become a bestseller in France and the English-language version has just been published. One man who hopes it will help to reclaim Bothwell’s reputation is his descendant Sir Alastair Buchan-Hepburn, who has mounted a campaign to have Bothwell’s remains returned.
“It is very much our hope that he will be returned to Scotland and given a place of burial here,” he says. “Bothwell’s battles are long over but we have not stopped fighting for him, for a recognition of the heroic part he played in Scottish history. He was no murderer; everyone wanted Darnley dead apart from his own father, and indeed there is some hard evidence that Darnley was plotting to kill Bothwell and Mary when he blew himself up. He was a true patriot at a time when loyalty and honour were hard to find.”
Bothwell died, his mind unhinged, in a Danish dungeon in 1578. For the 10 years after he fled Scotland when Mary traded his freedom for her own capture, he was chained to a pillar around which his feet had worn a groove in the stone floor. His queen spent 19 years in captivity before her execution at the age of 44 on the orders of Elizabeth I.
Buchan-Hepburn hopes to persuade the Scottish first minister to approach the Danish royal family: “The Danes see it not as a family matter but as a head-of-state-to-another-head-of-state matter, so we really need the Scottish government to intercede. I do think we have a duty to repatriate and remember this man, who was so important to how British history unravelled itself.”
Hermary-Vieille agrees: “I don’t see any reason why the Danes want to keep this man in some little church at the end of nowhere. He was the king and he belongs to Scotland. I went to visit the church in Denmark and the coffin is behind big, big iron chains and a lock. It is sad he is still locked up. He needs to be free now. And come home.”
guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010
Published via the Guardian News Feed plugin for WordPress.
World of Royalty Blog- Sneak peek: June 2012 new royalty books
- Naomi Watts “terrified” at Princess Diana role
- Duchess of York aide remains behind bars
- Two queens and their Diamond Jubilees
- King’s bathtub in kitchen at Kew Palace
- Royal Week in Review – May 19, 2012
- The Severed Head by Julia Kristeva – review
- Snow White and the Huntsman
- Bring up the Bodies – excerpt
- Maybe it’s not the end of the world
